Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door HairRobinHood
Advantage between a depleted and not depleted donor area after let's say 6-7 procedures?
I would definitely prefer the NOT depleted donor area after having 6-7 procedures - what a question.
After about 6-7 procedures, and the donor area still looks healthy and simply not "moth-eaten" - guess what you still could do ...
Here're some snapshots of Mr. Joling's donor area AFTER 1500 HST extractions
(~18 month after having his 1st HST procedure) ...
I can't see neither any white dots, nor gaps between all the FU's. You will see completely the same situation after having his 2nd HSt procedure with 1750 grafts. In other words, he could ALWAYS shave his head and nobody would see or notice anything - no white dots, no gaps, no "moth-eaten" hair. And as long as there is always ENOUGH healthy hair - no problem to make extractions again. It always depends on HOW successful (regrowth rate) the donor regeneration process has been FOR YOU after every extraction procedure. |
You act like it is a given that any patient with 7000-8000 grafts (normal FUE) has a completely depleted donor area with huge white spots everywhere. That's false already. If you are really convinced by that than please tell me right now.
Than its useless for me to continue with you. No offense because it's ridiculous. He's using small equipment but so does somebody like Dr.Feriduni if your hair is suited for it.
I was not talking about white dots either. That's still personal related too, some people heal very nicely and some dont. My point is, if hasci can only do 6-7 procedures with 1000-1500 grafts, than why would you choose for them ? You choose for hasci if you want a full head of hair because you are completely bald. Until now there's no example at all that that is possible and hasci knows this too.
Lets be honest, we all want this to be true and possible. There should be no bias but its just not possible.