Naast de veiligheid, is dit de hoofdreden dat ik (nog) niet met RU begonnen ben.
Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door ryan82
Interessant artikel over RU58841 !
http://hairlosscure2020.com/the-stra...nt-of-ru58841/
Coming back to the title of this blog post, the reason I find RU58841’s predicament strange is due to the fact that despite a respectable amount of evidence over the past two decades in support of the product’s anti-androgenic capabilities, no company has decided to go through with clinical trials for this product for use as an anti-androgen. This is especially surprising considering that side effects are likely to be minimal to non-existent when RU58841 is applied in low doses. Perhaps companies do not think that the product is much better than topical Minoxidil? Or perhaps because the product cannot be patented, the long-term profitability and monopoly of any new product containing RU58841 is suspect? Even stranger, the research on this product has dried up in recent years, which is not true for other anti-androgens such as Spironolactone and Flutamide.
:O |