Bijna 100.000 bezoekers p/mnd! Zie hier
|
7 juni 2011, 01:34 | #46 |
HaarWeb lid
Geregistreerd: 17 september 2004
Berichten: 1.198
|
Yes now I cant follow you anymore either, Stevie. A couple of posts ago you asked Roloff to buy a miscroscope to show it.
You want to hear all kind of answers but you easily ignore the main point and calls it "clearly not impossible'' while there's no proof at all. What clearly not impossible ? Ps dont come up with Gho's own article and evidence with 5 donors. |
7 juni 2011, 01:48 | #47 |
HaarWeb lid
Geregistreerd: 19 april 2011
Berichten: 190
|
No no no no no. Wait iam not saying DOnor Regrowth in general is impossible.
I only criticise the way Gho is promoting it, which in my opinion is unethical in his terms of presentation because he just doesnt use this possibility in a good way. I aksed Roloff to buy a microscope because i wann finally see Gho patients to take responsibility and show us if Gho is right or if he just claims BS in ways of telling but not delivering. Donor regrowth happened accidentally in some FUE patients but no one did in fact investigate this furter. There are studies for this besides Ghos. Sorry should have brought up those links before http://www.tissuereconstruction.it/i...icoli&Itemid=2 |
7 juni 2011, 02:00 | #48 |
HaarWeb lid
Geregistreerd: 29 augustus 2010
Berichten: 174
|
Donor regrowth doesn't exist unless we see proof.
dr. Cole said that he observed up to 54% of donor regrowth in FUE'd patients using Acell, but at the same time, he said: >>>> With body hair, you can totally remove an area through FUE and then go back 6 months later and it is full of hair. it is thinner, but there is plenty of hair. The reason is that there are many hair in the exogen phase on the body. <<<< So, it looks to me that dr. Cole wants to jump on the Acell bandwagon hype, but at the same time, he wants to avoid telling lies. The result is a weird mixture: "Acell doesn't work for HM, but I am getting some results with it" |
7 juni 2011, 03:07 | #49 |
HaarWeb lid
Geregistreerd: 19 april 2011
Berichten: 190
|
Scalp hair works the other way if you have pigmented spot those spots are empty.
In Coles study he looked at the etraction sites and how many of them actually Vanished. Also did you read the link i posted? I think you didnt because it also states that hair regrowth is possible |
7 juni 2011, 04:16 | #50 |
HaarWeb lid
Geregistreerd: 29 augustus 2010
Berichten: 174
|
Now I have looked at the italian study you posted (2009).
Yes, they claim some amount of multiplication using horizontal bisection ex-vivo. But studies can be faked. Even the peer-reviewed ones. So lets see if the italian team can do a full restauration as proof of concept. Otherwise, its all paperware. >> Scalp hair works the other way if you have pigmented spot those spots are empty. << ?? >> In Coles study he looked at the etraction sites and how many of them actually Vanished. << vanished and regrew a new graft? or just vanished? |
7 juni 2011, 04:35 | #51 | |
HaarWeb lid
Geregistreerd: 19 april 2011
Berichten: 190
|
Citaat:
|
|
7 juni 2011, 05:41 | #52 | |
HaarWeb lid
Geregistreerd: 29 mei 2010
Berichten: 199
|
Citaat:
I think you didn't that yourself, because the study DOESN'T state that "REgrowth is possible". They removed the hairs in the donor area via traditional STRIP removal - which of course results in NO REgrowth in the DONOR area! What a psychIatric loser ... |
|
7 juni 2011, 11:16 | #53 |
HaarWeb lid
Geregistreerd: 19 april 2011
Berichten: 190
|
Hello Iron.Man
there is no reason to call me a psycho Loser because i ask questions, that Gho patients avoid to answer, also we are all waiting for your personal Gho report which should had to come a few months ago, according to you. Anyway i dont wanna transfer personal attacks from HS to haarweb, its not good, you shouldnt do it as well because it destroys a normal conversation. I choose this link for specific reason. First reason, it shows that a hair itself (the dead hair material) can produce a new hair, therefore its obvious that a plucked hair can be transplanted as well. And so we have a proof of concept for hair multiplication to work. ALso in this study they used the upper and under half which leads to the conclusion that you could splat a hair and get "two" or more out of it. And now please, dont go into insulting mode again, you could spare at least one hair loss board, or do you want to get banned on the FOURTH board? |
7 juni 2011, 11:30 | #54 |
HaarWeb lid
Geregistreerd: 24 december 2010
Berichten: 28
|
|
7 juni 2011, 23:41 | #55 |
HaarWeb lid
Geregistreerd: 29 augustus 2010
Berichten: 174
|
Important:
About the italian study posted by Stevie.Dee: http://www.tissuereconstruction.it/i...icoli&Itemid=2 From 100 donor hairs, they split them into 100+100 halves and they finally render 70+70 hairs. So, from 100 donor hairs they get 140 hairs. This is a 40% increase in haircounts (very nice). BUT: they also say that the final hairs are "slightly" thinner than the originals: the caliper is 75% of the original. Well, sorry but this is not slightly thinner. This is *significantly* thinner. Diameter is 75% of the original, but cross section is 56% of the original (0.75x0.75= 0.56). So, the final hairs have aprox. *half* cross section compared to the originals!! This means, half mass of hair, and probably half mass of stem cells. So, you start with 100 full-sized donor hairs and end up with 140 hairs that are only 56% cross-section of the originals. These are equivalent to 78.4 full-sized hairs!! So, you start with 100 full-size hairs and you end up with only 78.4 full-size hairs. In other words, this is not hair multiplication, and this study is FLAWED. Unless I am wrong in my analysis.... please, tell me if I am wrong... Also, note that they don't post results beyond the 12-month timepoint. This is not enough to verify if the hairs can cycle well. Laatst gewijzigd door Spanish Dude; 7 juni 2011 om 23:44 |
7 juni 2011, 23:55 | #56 |
HaarWeb lid
Geregistreerd: 19 april 2011
Berichten: 190
|
Thats your opinion, read this study and interpret it like you will. One fact remains Donor regrowth is not impossible
|
8 juni 2011, 00:20 | #57 | |
HaarWeb lid
Geregistreerd: 17 september 2004
Berichten: 1.198
|
Citaat:
|
|
8 juni 2011, 00:54 | #58 | ||
HaarWeb lid
Geregistreerd: 29 augustus 2010
Berichten: 174
|
Citaat:
Citaat:
another thing: when I open the pdf, I only see until page 1122, and then a blank page. Am I missing something? Laatst gewijzigd door Spanish Dude; 8 juni 2011 om 01:43 |
||
8 juni 2011, 01:03 | #59 |
HaarWeb lid
Geregistreerd: 19 april 2011
Berichten: 190
|
My opinion is : If you can create hair multiplication, you could aso increase the rate and the size of the hairs.
And no i cant give you more depth because i only know one thing for sure, we all know nothing at all. |
8 juni 2011, 01:46 | #60 | |
HaarWeb lid
Geregistreerd: 29 augustus 2010
Berichten: 174
|
Citaat:
If my analysis is right, this would mean that we have yet another failed bisection study. The only successful bisection study that I know is Gho's HST, but I don't trust dr. Gho. |
|