okay, now I am able to read the 1123 page, same as you, until "showed greater motility", but then the figure 4A is missing, and I think there is more text missing, probably there are some pages missing.
Anyway, if I am correct, the resulting hairs are only 56% cross area compared to the originals. This means that they have 56% weight, and 56% strength, 56% volume, etc etc.
This has an important cosmetical impact.
So, unless I am proven wrong, this study confirms again that hair bisection is not able to increase hair mass. In this study, bisection produces a 21.6% reduction in overal hair mass.
Citaat:
Oorspronkelijk geplaatst door Stevie.Dee
i can read till 1123 end of page.
Page nds with " potential.
In cultures derived from the lower portion,
cell colonies had a smaller diameter (Figure 4A), and
elements in cytokinesis were occasionally found.
Hair-derived keratinocytes showed greater motility"
Also i do mistaks so no one can say i am absolutely right. But in this study i dint found anything saying that the hairs had been decreased in a way which is cosmetically challenging
|