Bijna 100.000 bezoekers p/mnd! Zie hier
|
3 december 2012, 11:21 | #11 | |
HaarWeb lid
Geregistreerd: 29 mei 2010
Berichten: 199
|
Citaat:
here we have 2 patient results – performed by Dr. Feriduni: *************************************** Patient 1: http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/album.php?albumid=465 Donor density of ~ 96-104 FU/cm2 1499 FUE extractions * 674 single hair FU * 825 double hair FU Extraction performed with a 0,95 mm FUE punch *************************************** Patient 2: http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showthr...1153#post91153 Occipital donor density of ~ 80-90 FU/cm2 3112 FUE extractions within 2 days * 735 single hair FU * 2106 double hair FU * 271 triple hair FU Extraction performed with a 0,9 mm FUE punch *************************************** Discussion Patient 1 is a normal young and healthy patient with an extraordinarily high donor density. Why just 1-hair and 2-hair grafts? And why didn’t he extract at least more 2-hair grafts instead of so many 1-hair grafts with a 0.95 punch from a patient with such a great and virgin donor density? Patient 2 is also a normal young, healthy and virgin patient with a pretty good donor density. Why just 271 triple grafts? What happens if this patient needs more than 1 procedure? Is Dr. Feriduni or any other doctor still able to extract again 271 triple hair grafts with a 0.9 mm punch from this patients’ donor area? For both patients: Would it make sense to count, to know and to provide these patients the extraction data? Actually, I think YES, because in such a case we would know why a guy like you is crying like a baby. In such cases, I think it would be FAR more wisely, to do HST, try to extract the best grafts in the 1st procedure, let the donor area regenerate and do a 2nd procedure - right? The only difference would be only 9-12 month away to reach the same goal as with just 1 normal FUE procedure - and NO LONG LASTING REDNESS! Laatst gewijzigd door HairRobinHood; 3 december 2012 om 11:30 |
|